Another moronic plot to damage Russia as the US strains to hold on to world dominance
The Empire is Falling
"...“For America, the chief geopolitical prize is
Eurasia…and America’s global primacy is directly dependent on how long
and how effectively its preponderance on the Eurasian continent is
sustained.”...
...."Get the picture? Eurasian integration is already done-deal and there’s nothing the US can do to stop it.
Washington needs to rethink its approach. Stop the
meddling and antagonism, rebuild relations through trade and mutual
trust, and accept the inevitability of imperial decline.
Asia’s star is rising just as America’s is setting. Deal with it...."
“The U.S. must show the leadership necessary to
establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing
potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or
pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate
interests…..We must, however, be mindful that…Russia will remain the
strongest military power in Eurasia and the only power in the world with
the capability of destroying the United States.”
— The Wolfowitz Doctrine, the original version of the Defense Planning Guidance, authored by Under Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, leaked to the New York Times on March 7, 1992
“For America, the chief geopolitical prize is
Eurasia…and America’s global primacy is directly dependent on how long
and how effectively its preponderance on the Eurasian continent is
sustained.”
— The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy And It’s Geostrategic Imperatives, Zbigniew Brzezinski, page 30
The Laussanne negotiations between Iran and the so called P5+1 group (the
United States, Russia, China, France, Britain, and Germany) have
nothing to do with nuclear proliferation. They are, in fact, another attempt to weaken and isolate Russia by easing sanctions, thus allowing Iranian gas to replace Russian gas in Europe.
Laussanne shows that Washington still thinks that the greatest threat
to its dominance is the further economic integration of Russia and
Europe, a massive two-continent free trade zone from Lisbon to Vladivostok that would eventually dwarf dwindling US GDP while decisively shifting the balance of global power to Asia.
To counter that threat, the Obama administration toppled the elected
government of Ukraine in a violent coup, launched a speculative attack
on the ruble, forced down global oil prices, and is presently arming and
training neo-Nazi extremists in the Ukrainian army. Washington has done
everything in its power to undermine relations between the EU and
Russia risking even nuclear war in its effort to separate the natural trading partners and to strategically situate itself in a location where it can control the flow of vital resources from East to West.
Laussanne was about strategic priorities not nukes. The
Obama administration realizes that if it can’t find an alternate source
of gas for Europe, then its blockade of Russia will fail and the
EU-Russia alliance will grow stronger. And if the EU-Russia alliance
grows stronger, then US attempts to extend its tentacles into Asia and
become a major player in the world’s most prosperous region will also
fail leaving Washington to face a dismal future in which the steady
erosion of its power and prestige is a near certainty. This is from an
article titled “Removing sanctions against Iran to have unfavorable
influence on Turkey and Azerbaijan”:
“If Washington removes energy sanctions on Iran…then a new geopolitical configuration will emerge in the region. Connecting with Nabucco will be enough for Iran to fully supply Europe with gas…
Iran takes the floor with inexhaustible oil and gas
reserves and as a key transit country. Iran disposes of the 10% of the
reported global oil reserves and is the second country in the world
after Russia with its natural gas reserves (15%). The official
representatives of Iran do not hide that they strive to enter the
European market of oil and gas, as in the olden days. Let’s remember
that the deputy Minister of Oil in Iran, Ali Majedi, offered to revive
project of Nabucco pipeline during his European tour and said that his
country is ready to supply gas to Europe through it…
“Some months earlier the same Ali Majedi reported
sensational news: ‘two invited European delegations’ discussed the
potential routes of Iranian gas supply to Europe,” the article reads.” …
It is also noted that the West quite materially reacted to the
possibility of the Iranian gas to join Nabucco.” (Removing sanctions against Iran to have unfavorable influence on Turkey and Azerbaijan, Panorama)
So, is this the plan, to provide “energy security” to Europe by replacing Russian gas with Iranian gas?
“After almost three years of
go-anywhere see-anything interview-anyone inspections, IAEA inspectors
have yet to find any indication that Iran has — or ever had — a nuclear
weapons program.” — Gordon Prather, nuclear weapons physicist
It sure looks like it. But that suggests that the sanctions really had nothing to do with Iran’s fictitious nuclear weapons program
but were merely used to humiliate Iran while keeping as much of its oil
and gas offline until western-backed multinationals could get their
greasy mitts on it.
Indeed, that’s exactly how the sanctions were used even though the nuclear issue was a transparent fake from the get go. Get a load of this from the New York Times:
“Recent assessments by American spy agencies are broadly
consistent with a 2007 intelligence finding that concluded that Iran had
abandoned its nuclear weapons program years earlier, according to
current and former American officials. The officials said that
assessment was largely reaffirmed in a 2010 National Intelligence
Estimate, and that it remains the consensus view of America’s 16
intelligence agencies.” (U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb, James Risen, New York Times, February 24, 2012)
See? The entire US intelligence establishment has been
saying the same thing from the onset: No Iranian nukes. Nor has Iran
ever been caught diverting nuclear fuel to other purposes. Never. Also,
as nuclear weapons physicist, Gordon Prather stated many times before
his death, “After almost three years of go-anywhere see-anything
interview-anyone inspections, IAEA inspectors have yet to find any
indication that Iran has — or ever had — a nuclear weapons program.”
The inspectors were on the ground for three freaking
years. They interviewed everyone and went wherever they wanted. They
searched every cave and hideaway, every nook and cranny, and they found
nothing.
Get it? No nukes, not now, not ever. Period.
The case against Iran is built on propaganda,
brainwashing and bullshit, in that order. But, still, that doesn’t tell
us why the US is suddenly changing course. For that, we turn to an
article from The Brookings Institute titled “Why the details of the Iran
deal don’t matter” which sums it up quite well. Here’s a clip:
“At heart, this is a fight over what to do about Iran’s
challenge to U.S. leadership in the Middle East and the threat that
Iranian geopolitical ambitions pose to U.S. allies, particularly Israel
and Saudi Arabia. Proponents of the deal believe that the best way for
the United States to deal with the Iranian regional challenge is to seek
to integrate Iran into the regional order, even while remaining wary of
its ambitions. A nuclear deal is an important first step in that
regard, but its details matter little because the ultimate goal is to
change Iranian intentions rather destroy Iranian capability.” (Why the details of the Iran deal don’t matter, Brookings)
Notice how carefully the author avoids mentioning
Israel by name although he alludes to “the threat that Iranian
geopolitical ambitions pose to U.S. allies”. Does he think he’s talking to idiots?
But his point is well taken; the real issue is not
“Iranian capability”, but “Iran’s challenge to U.S. leadership in the
Middle East”. In other words, the nuclear issue is baloney. What
Washington doesn’t like is that Iran has an independent foreign policy
that conflicts with the US goal of controlling the Middle East. That’s what’s really going on. Washington wants a compliant Iran that clicks its heals and does what its told.
The problem is, the strategy hasn’t worked and now the US
is embroiled in a confrontation with Moscow that is a higher priority
than the Middle East project. (The split between US elites on this
matter has been interesting to watch, with the Obama-Brzezinski crowd on
one side and the McCain-neocon crowd on the other.) This is why the
author thinks that easing sanctions and integrating Iran into the
predominantly US system would be the preferable remedy for at least the
short term.
Repeat: “The best way for the United States to deal with
the Iranian regional challenge is to integrate Iran into the regional
order.” In other words, if you can’t beat ’em, then join ’em. Iran is
going to be given enough freedom to fulfill its role within the
imperial order, that is, to provide gas to Europe in order to inflict
more economic pain on Russia. Isn’t that what’s going on?
But what effect will that have on Iran-Russia relations? Will it poison the well and turn one ally against the other?
© Russia today
Kazakhstan’s President Nursultan Nazarbayev has suggested establishing a free trade zone involving Russia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan; all bordering the Caspian Sea and oil-rich.
Kazakhstan’s President Nursultan Nazarbayev has suggested establishing a free trade zone involving Russia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan; all bordering the Caspian Sea and oil-rich.
Probably not, mainly because the ties between Iran and Russia are growing stronger by the day. Check this out from the Unz Review by Philip Giraldi:
“Moscow and Tehran are moving towards a de-facto strategic
partnership, which can be easily seen by the two groundbreaking
announcements from earlier this week. It’s now been confirmed by the
Russian government that the rumored oil-for-goods program between Russia and Iran is actually a real policy that’s already been implemented,
showing that Moscow has wasted no time in trying to court the Iranian
market after the proto-deal was agreed to a week earlier. Providing
goods in exchange for resources is a strategic decision that creates
valuable return customers in Iran, who will then be in need of
maintenance and spare parts for their products. It’s also a sign of deep friendship between the two Caspian neighbors and sets the groundwork for the tentative North-South economic corridor between Russia and India via Iran.” (A Shifting Narrative on Iran, Unz Review)
But here’s the glitch: Iran can’t just turn on the spigot
and start pumping gas to Europe. It doesn’t work that way. It’s going to
take massive pipeline and infrastructure upgrades that could take years
to develop. That means there will be plenty of hefty contracts awarded
to friends of Tehran – mostly Russian and Chinese – who will perform
their tasks without interfering in domestic politics. Check this out
from Pepe Escobar:
“Russia and China are deeply committed to integrating Iran
into their Eurasian vision. Iran may finally be admitted as a full
member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) at the upcoming
summer summit in Russia. That implies a full-fledged
security/commercial/political partnership involving Russia, China, Iran
and most Central Asian ‘stans’.
Iran is already a founding member of the Chinese-led Asian
Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB); that means financing for an
array of New Silk Road-related projects bound to benefit the Iranian
economy. AIIB funding will certainly merge with loans and other
assistance for infrastructure development related to the
Chinese-established Silk Road Fund…” (Russia, China, Iran: In sync, Pepe Escobar, Russia Today)
Get the picture? Eurasian integration is already done-deal and there’s nothing the US can do to stop it.
Washington needs to rethink its approach. Stop the
meddling and antagonism, rebuild relations through trade and mutual
trust, and accept the inevitability of imperial decline.
Asia’s star is rising just as America’s is setting. Deal with it.
Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).