Countering Hillary's Coup With a Counter Coup - or Not?
by TDB
Nov 3, 2016 11:13 AM
Countering Hillary's Coup With a Counter Coup - or Not?
Video: Corruption, Cooptation, Cronyism: The Hillary Clinton “Takeover”, The “Counter-Coup”, Action of America’s Intelligence Community –Global Research
Is
it possible the recent counter coup announced by Steve Pieczenik, a
former official in numerous Republican administrations, is actually part
of a much larger dominant social theme designed to reinforce positive
perceptions regarding the most secretive and powerful government
agencies?
Global Research, one of the very best alternative websites, does us the favor of providing “a video presentation by Dr. Steve Pieczenik, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State." It has also provided us with a transcript of Pieczenik’s remarks.
Pieczenik
"has served as foreign policy expert in several US administrations
including Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.”
More:
The analysis and
focus presented below must be taken very seriously. It sheds light on
the ongoing political crisis in the US and the opposition which is
developing from within the US intelligence community against the Clinton
crime cabal.
According
to Pieczenik, “Hillary and Bill Clinton are attempting a takeover of
the United States and will stop at nothing. A coup d’état of this
magnitude has never been affected in such a subtly calculated way.”
Pieczenik
goes on to explain how the FBI, CIA, Pentagon and other official
military-industrial agencies have gotten together silently to fight the
silent “coup” of Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Basically
the argument is that “pay-to-play” has been created by the Clinton
Foundation, which is apparently under substantive investigation.
Hillary
and Bill would use their contacts and influence to push the US
government into taking action in ways which enhanced the interests and
profits of certain countries and individuals if they contributed to the
Clinton Foundation.
The
Foundation is evidently a government-in-waiting for the Clintons and
having such a large entity as their disposal enhances their power
considerably.
But
both Hillary and Bill Clinton don’t seem to be very stable people.
Hillary has a horrible temper and is evidently contemptuous of those
beneath her. Bill Clinton has been the subject of rape accusations and
organized, international drug dealing - and Hillary has evidently
abetted some of his worst behavior..
Yet
it is certainly possible that neither Bill nor Hillary are fully aware
of the scale of the manipulation in which they are enmeshed, nor its
timeline. Are they now part of a rapidly unfolding psyop that has its
roots decades ago?
Maybe
Pieczenik, Julian Assange and others are indeed true heroes for
countering the Clinton's emergent authoritarianism, as they appear to
be. This is certainly an incredibly admirable and deserved perspective.
But there are other interpretations.
Our
primary purpose is to analyze elite dominant social themes and that's
why we are raising these questions, hypothetical as they may be. Hillary
Clinton is an apparent threat to the what’s left of the liberties of
the USA but there is a possibility, perhaps a slim one, that this new
"coup" narrative is not what it seems.
Regardless
of the status of the US – corporation, democracy, republic – the US
functions, day-to-day, with a certain expectation of freedom. This is
why those on “right” – libertarian or conservative – are evidently
shocked (on videos and in print) when the US government and those behind
it take actions that one would not expect to take place in a
“republic.”
Now
we are informed that this sentiment is an animating force in parts of
the Pentagon, CIA, FBI, etc. The counter-argument, of course, is that
the FBI, CIA and Pentagon have not usually been seen as guardians of
“freedom.”
The
FBI has put hundreds if not thousands of people in jail because of
flawed fingerprint and hair analysis that some in the bureau knew to be
false all along. To the best of our knowledge, a lot of the damage was
never properly addressed.
The
CIA is responsible for the deaths, injuries and miserable lives of
millions, even billions, around the world because it represses freedom
in favor of elite control of countries and their governments.
Constitutionally
speaking, the FBI and CIA probably should not exist, let alone be
spread around the world. The Pentagon, which recently mislaid $8
trillion, supports CIA covert intel actions with its own more overt
military activities.
It
is wonderful that people within them are supportive of freedom. But the
CIA, FBI, Pentagon, etc., don’t actually work for the people in the US.
At the top levels, they seem to work for the private banking interests
that have installed and organized them and are pursuing a greater
globalism that likely includes the destruction of the US..
Today
there is considerable conflict between private banking interests and
the alternative ‘Net media, and the people it represents. One way to
reduce this conflict would be to make it clear to people who value a
culture of freedom that the most authoritarian agencies in the US are
secretly aligned with them. (See also our skeptical comments regarding
the Brexit vote in our "populism vs. globalism articles.")
This
seems beyond the pale and ludicrous but these banking interests are
both subtle and powerful. One way or another, they evidently control the
central banks of the world and thus hundreds of trillions of dollars.
They may even have propagated a kind of nuclear myth, as we have pointed
out here in the past, that has affected people's sentiments and priorities for decades.
They
tend to work through the dominant social themes we analyze because they
are absolutely determined that people are to back their globalist plans
on a voluntary basis without knowing they are doing so.
In
the Internet era, these “memes” have begun to founder in critical ways.
But those creating them continue to try. They are abetted by millions
(and more), who are aligned with them professionally or emotionally –
some because they don’t know any better.
At the very top, everyone else is likely disposable (except for a handful of owners) and apt to be manipulated as necessary.
This
is probably an article that many may react to emotionally and even
negatively. But we are certainly not trying to support Hillary’s
campaign, only to point out that in this world not everything is at it
seems, especially when it comes to authoritarian agents of the state.
Conclusion: Your
first priority is to take care of yourself and your family. Politics,
especially today, seems to offer the hope of greater freedom but usually
does not. For more on the issues we’ve raised, please use a search
engine to find “TheDailyBell” and “populism versus globalism” (here, here and elsewhere). These issues may be tied to an an even larger propaganda campaign.
See also ...