A challenge in the south for NATO
Comment
Oh!And what a delicious , all so timely little challenge this will be too, may I kindly add! It so happens that we, the Humans , have been more and more blessed, these late post-post modern years, to comprehend some few things about the NON-benevolent Rulers' WAY OF GOVERNANCE.
So, thanks to some very courageous, caring and brave Beings throughout the Globe and our discernment and facts' analysis,we came to the hot spot of spotting one very basic article of the Rulers' Theorem: ''First you create a crisis, then you hustle into the situation offering the solution , which is of course, fecund and profitable only to you."
It so happens now that the nwo' s armies have established themselves well in Europe and are positively expanding to the Eastern lands.What is left to be deployed into and upon? The Mediterranean Sea undoubtedly!
Thus we can reach a concrete answer as to the burning question:"Why are they, the nwo, spending so much time , money, scientific and technological know-how, diplomatic and strategic schemes, just to destabilize, terrorize , dehumanize, brutalize Africa and Middle-East and Central Asia, nation after nation after nation? "
Because they want to conquer the Human Societies both economically and militarily. Because, for their own inexplicable reasons, they seem to need a subservient, enslaved and in continuous trepidation humanity, to implement their chaotic, non-human , shock and awe, blast down into rubble and ruins tactics and then merrily exercise their governance upon.
A malformed option, vicious and ugly indeed.
Evidently there is a method as to how desolate and desperate people find themselves, if not drowned or killed or blown apart by mines, on the European shores and borders, after having paid 3.000$ to 6.000$ per person to the pirates and slavers.
Somehow, someway the money reaches them or the smugglers.
Just for the 200.000 migrants ready to go -only for Italian shores- as per the article's data , a total amount of 600.000.000$ is deposited. How come?
If such great numbers of these areas' inhabitants had such huge per capita incomes from their good work and their good home economic conditions, even if not steadily so,we would not call them ''developing'' but ''developed economies'' and us, ourselves, of the European South, so irksomely struggling to ''develop''... ....''developing'' , to say the least. m.l.p.
It so happens now that the nwo' s armies have established themselves well in Europe and are positively expanding to the Eastern lands.What is left to be deployed into and upon? The Mediterranean Sea undoubtedly!
Thus we can reach a concrete answer as to the burning question:"Why are they, the nwo, spending so much time , money, scientific and technological know-how, diplomatic and strategic schemes, just to destabilize, terrorize , dehumanize, brutalize Africa and Middle-East and Central Asia, nation after nation after nation? "
Because they want to conquer the Human Societies both economically and militarily. Because, for their own inexplicable reasons, they seem to need a subservient, enslaved and in continuous trepidation humanity, to implement their chaotic, non-human , shock and awe, blast down into rubble and ruins tactics and then merrily exercise their governance upon.
A malformed option, vicious and ugly indeed.
Evidently there is a method as to how desolate and desperate people find themselves, if not drowned or killed or blown apart by mines, on the European shores and borders, after having paid 3.000$ to 6.000$ per person to the pirates and slavers.
Somehow, someway the money reaches them or the smugglers.
Just for the 200.000 migrants ready to go -only for Italian shores- as per the article's data , a total amount of 600.000.000$ is deposited. How come?
If such great numbers of these areas' inhabitants had such huge per capita incomes from their good work and their good home economic conditions, even if not steadily so,we would not call them ''developing'' but ''developed economies'' and us, ourselves, of the European South, so irksomely struggling to ''develop''... ....''developing'' , to say the least. m.l.p.
Migrants
wait to disembark from the Italian Coast Guard ship Fiorillo, at the
Catania harbor, Sicily, southern Italy, Friday, April 24, 2015.
(Alessandra Tarantino/AP)
Jim Hoagland is a contributing editor to The Post. His e-mail is jim.hoagland@washpost.com.
The
Cold War made Europe’s Atlantic identity paramount in the Old
Continent’s dealings with the world and particularly with its American
ally. Mediterranean and Central European countries developed habits of
cooperation and consultation in NATO that promoted the flow of security
commitments, commerce and ideas across the North Atlantic.
But
the turmoil sweeping the southern and eastern shores of the
Mediterranean today threatens to transform Europe’s strategic outlook on
security matters. The United States must pay careful attention to the
growing gaps in the ways Washington and its European partners define the
greatest dangers to their common well-being.
“For
us, the biggest threat comes from the South,” says an Italian friend
deeply experienced in NATO matters who now spends his time worrying
about waves of migrants
fleeing the wars, poverty and breakdowns in governance along the
Mediterranean littoral.
“Our nightmares are not about Russian tanks invading from the east. They are about the terrorists a short boat ride away in Libya.”
“Our nightmares are not about Russian tanks invading from the east. They are about the terrorists a short boat ride away in Libya.”
“Nobody
in France is debating about arming Ukraine,” a conservative French
parliamentarian once known for his hawkish Cold War views told me this
week. “We are debating how much national surveillance we need to spot
terrorists returning from war zones in Syria and Iraq, and how to stop
Africa from completely imploding.”
Many
Americans will be tempted to leave the Mediterranean crisis to the
Europeans to deal with on their own. But the need for a new emphasis on
alliance solidarity and burden-sharing is underscored at this moment by
Vladimir Putin’s aggression in eastern Ukraine and the uncertain NATO
response it has provoked.
NATO is now, in fact, divided into three factions on Ukraine.
Mediterranean
countries are distracted and distant from any common effort to oppose
Putin’s attempt to rewrite the rules of war and peace in modern Europe
in Russia’s favor. Fatigue with economic sanctions against Russia is
setting in for France, Italy and even Britain. (One measure of the
decline of the Atlantic identity in European affairs is Britain’s
growing absence in power projection and major-power diplomacy. The
current election campaign has contributed to this tendency, but larger
forces are shaping the pullback.)
Poland
and the Baltic nations, fearing they could be next on Putin’s list, are
at the other end of the spectrum. They take a tough, Atlanticist line
and seek to deter Putin by multiplying the tripwires that would bring
NATO troops to their aid in the event of Russian attacks across their
frontiers.
The Obama administration
occupies a shifting, reactive middle ground on Ukraine, letting German
Chancellor Angela Merkel play the leading role in dealing with Putin
while trying to reassure Poland and the Baltic states by rotating U.S.
planes and troops into their territories in an operation code-named Atlantic Resolve.
This
approach has the merit of keeping Russian-American tensions at a
manageable level. But it has not halted Putin’s buildup of Russian
forces in Ukraine or prompted him to rein in military commanders who
threaten the West with nuclear destruction when the whim strikes them.
It will be surprising if the Russian leader does not see a golden
opportunity here to drive a wedge between the United States and Europe
and if he does not keep the opportunity alive as long as he can.
That
alone is a strong reason for Americans to show solidarity with European
allies confronting a traumatic redefining of the security challenges to
their societies. This is particularly true of Italy, which has been
left alone to cope with the swelling tide of refugees and migrants over
the past four years.
Italy is likely to see 200,000 migrants come
ashore this year, Prime Minister Matteo Renzi told me this month in
Washington, where he appealed to President Obama for U.S. support for
European efforts to handle that tide. European Union leaders pledged
ships and other help at a summit Thursday.
Washington
should now see to it that NATO’s Atlantic Resolve mission to bolster
Ukraine’s neighbors is matched by alliance involvement in the
Mediterranean crisis. That involvement — call it Mediterranean Resolve —
would take a different form, but it would also demonstrate that
security is indivisible for all NATO members. The forces driving
desperate people from Eritrea, Syria, Mali and other failing countries
to put their fate in the hands of human smugglers in Libya are global
ones that require a coordinated response from history’s most successful
alliance.
Read more about this topic: The Post’s View: Solving the African migrant crisis