More Doctors Confessing To Intentionally Diagnosing Healthy People With Cancer To Make Money
Why shouldn’t Doctors lie when the entire cancer industry is one gigantic fabrication from start to finish?
Is it any wonder that cancer societies worldwide put a far greater
financial initiative on chemotherapy and radiation research than disease
prevention techniques? Preventing disease doesn’t make money, but
treating disease certainly does.
Take Dr. Farid Fata, a prominent cancer doctor in Michigan who
admitted in court one year ago to intentionally and wrongfully
diagnosing healthy people with cancer. Fata also admitted to giving them
chemotherapy drugs for the purpose of making a profit.
Were his patients shocked? You bet they were. Who would ever
suspect a Doctor of faking a diagnosis to collect money. It’s
unconscionable. Yet it happens with cancer and almost every disease that
medical doctors can generate income through kickbacks and commissions
based on the volume of patients treated with specific pharmaceuticals.
Like anything people are used as a comodity.
“Many of these unscrupulous Physicians are like businessmen without
a conscience. The only difference is they have your health and trust in
their hands–a very dangerous combination when money is involved,” said
Dr. Sayed Mohammed, a retired Oncologist who admits seeing the trend
more than a decade ago.
“It is my choice,” Fata said on Tuesday of his surprise guilty
plea, which included rattling off the names of numerous drugs he
prescribed for his patients over the years. In each admission, he
uttered these words:
“I knew that it was medically unnecessary.”
Fata was charged with running a $35-million Medicare fraud
scheme that involved billing the government for medically unnecessary
oncology and hematology treatments.
The government says Fata ran the scheme from 2009 to the present,
through his medical businesses, including Michigan Hematology Oncology
Centers, with offices in Clarkston, Bloomfield Hills, Lapeer, Sterling
Heights, Troy and Oak Park.
According to the government, Fata had a patient load of 1,200
people and received $62 million from Medicare; he billed for more than
$150 million.
U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade said she plans to seek life in prison
for Fata, calling his case is “the most egregious” health care fraud
case her office has seen. She said Fata not only bilked the government —
which is typical in such cases — but he also harmed patients.
Lying with Statistics
Prostate cancer is another great example which doctors falsely give
prognoses about without giving patients the facts. A prostate (PSA)
blood test looks for prostate-specific antigen, a protein produced by
the prostate gland. High levels are supposedly associated with prostate
cancer. The problem is that the association isn’t always correct, and
when it is, the prostate cancer isn’t necessarily deadly. Only about 3
percent of all men die from prostate cancer. The PSA test usually leads
to overdiagnosis — biopsies and treatment in which the side effects are
impotence and incontinence. Repeated biopsies may spread cancer cells
into the track formed by the needle, or by spilling cancerous cells
directly into the bloodstream or lymphatic system. More than 90% of
Doctors who encourage cancer treatment for prostate cancer will generate
a commission from each treatment the patient receives. It proves risky
and often deadly in the long run for most people who don’t understand
how to take care of their health and are persuaded by false statistics.
Dozens of excellent large studies have been done on men who have
had cancer discovered in their prostate with a biopsy. In over 97% of
the cases this cancer either never spreads outside of the gland to cause
harm or the patient dies of something else long before any evidence of
cancer spreading outside of the prostate occurs.
In that 3% where cancer is aggressive and harms the patient, it
has already spread beyond the limits of surgical resection long before
discovery; thus, these men are not helped by surgery either.
After at least seven years of post-college graduate medical
education on the emotional, mental, and physical condition of the human
being, you would expect a physician to be a powerhouse of goodwill for
his or her patients. Unfortunately, too many doctors fail to keep the
welfare of their customers at the forefront, as their main concern. The
needs to boost their own egos, self-preservation, and the quest for more
money often result in inappropriate care and harm to the patient.
Most women are often told that hysterectomies lead to many
different cures for cancer and other ailments. This is misrepresenting
the truth.
The research done so far has demonstrated no improvement in
survival regardless of the aggressiveness of many of these unnecessary
treatments.
Breast cancer screenings also result in an increase in breast
cancer mortality and fail to address prevention. Despite no evidence
ever having supported any recommendations made for regular periodic
screening and mammography at any age, malicious recommendations from the
Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) and the American College of Radiology
(ACR) on breast cancer screening are now suggesting that breast cancer
screening should begin at age 40 and earlier in high-risk patients.
Published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR),
the recommendations released by the SBI and ACR state that the average
patient should begin annual breast cancer screening at age 40. They also
target women in their 30s if they are considered “high risk” as they
stated.
The rate of advanced breast cancer for U.S. women 25 to 39 years
old nearly doubled from 1976 to 2009, a difference too great to be a
matter of chance and more about diagnoses.
A disturbing study published in the New England Journal of Medicine
is bringing mainstream attention to the fact that mammography has
caused far more harm than good in the millions of women who have
employed it over the past 30 years as their primary strategy in the
fight against breast cancer.
It always has been and always will be about the money. It is not time to recognize the trend?
Chemotherapy Does Not Heal The Body–It Slowly Destroys It
Chemotherapy boosts cancer growth and long-term mortality rates.
Most chemotherapy patients either die or are plagued with illness within
10-15 years after treatment. It destroys their immune system, increases
neuro-cognitive decline, disrupts endocrine functioning and causes
organ and metabolic toxicities. Patients basically live in a permanent
state of disease until their death. The cancer industry marginalizes
safe and effective cures while promoting their patented, expensive, and
toxic remedies whose risks far exceed any benefit. This is what they do
best, and they do it because it makes money, plain and simple.
The reason a 5-year relative survival rate is the standard used to
assess mortality rates is due to most cancer patients going downhill
after this period. It’s exceptionally bad for business and the cancer
industry knows it.
They could never show the public the true 97% statistical failure rate in treating long-term metastatic cancers.
If they did publish the long-term statistics for all cancers
administered cytotoxic chemotherapy, that is 10+ years and produced the
objective data on rigorous evaluations including the cost-effectiveness,
impact on the immune system, quality of life, morbidity and mortality,
it would be very clear to the world that chemotherapy makes little to no
contribution to cancer survival at all. No such study has ever been
conducted by independent investigators in the history of chemotherapy.
The only studies available come from industry funded
institutions and scientists and none of them have ever inclusively
quantified the above variables.
Why? Money, greed and profits run the cancer industry–nothing else.
The cancer establishment must retreat from the truth to treat cancer
because there will never be any profit for them in in eradicating the
disease. There is no governing body in the world that protects consumers
from being subjected to these toxic therapies or even known carcinogens
in our foods our environment, because that too, will prevent the
profits from rolling in. It’s a business of mammoth proportions and must
be treated as such. The most powerful anti-carcinogenic plants in the
world such as cannabis must be demonized and be made illegal because
they are so effective at killing cancer cells without side effects.
Cannabinoids are so efficient at treating disease, that the U.S.
Government patented them in 2003.
If a “magic bullet” were used FIRST by orthodox medicine, meaning
the cut/burn/slash/poison treatments were avoided, a 90% true cure rate
would be easy to achieve. But the fact is that the leaders in the
medical community have absolutely no interest in finding a “magic
bullet.” A “magic bullet” would cost the drug companies hundreds of
billions of dollars, and patients would have less hospitalization and
less doctor visits, etc.
You might ask your oncologist why your chances of survival are only
3% (ignoring all of their statistical gibberish such as “5-year
survival rates” and deceptive terms like “remission” and “response”),
when your chance of survival would be over 90% if they used something
like DMSO.
Actually, bring up DMSO to any oncologist and most of them won’t
even talk to you about it. Why? Because DMSO is a natural product,
cannot be patented and cannot be made profitable because it is produced
by the ton in the wood industry.
Dr. Farid Fata is only a consequence of the system. Like him
there are thousands of legally practicing Doctors and oncologists in the
United States and abroad who are guilty of the same crimes, but because
they fly below the radar, they are never caught.
As we continue playing this charade of making the public believe
that poisons treat cancer, people will continue to die, and Doctors will
continue to make money up to the day of their patient’s death. Every
once in a while, we may catch a few (of the many) like Dr. Fata, who
self-destruct due to their own greed. We will claim they are outlaws,
banish them and tarnish their reputations based on a perception that a
healthy person should never be unnecessarily subjected to chemotherapy
for money.
So we can harshly judge and legally prosecute the Doctor who
falsely prescribes poison to a healthy person for money, but we proudly
accept the Doctor who prescribes poison to an unhealthy person for
money.
I find that truly mind blowing.
From: Organic And Healthy