Russia’s “No-Fly Zone” Prevents US, Israel, UK From Bombing Syria
Related: US, allies sending up to 4,000 more troops to Russia’s doorstep
Over 1,000 Daesh militant backups arrive in Yemen’s Aden to fight Ansarullah
By Brandon Turbeville
October 28, 2015
Thanks to J.
October 28, 2015
Thanks to J.
"...“Eli” has made an astute observation. Unless
the Israelis and NATO powers are truly willing to risk World War 3, the
ability to simply fly in through and over the Mediterranean has been
severely hampered by the Russian presence.
NATO and Israel could indeed identify themselves and their intentions
but they could be denied overflight permission to do so. They would then
be forced with the choice between simply stepping back or risking a
direct confrontation with Russian jets in the air.
Furthermore, “Eli” concludes that danger is indeed present. He writes,.."
It appears that, after a few weeks of Russian bombing in Syria, a new kind of “no-fly zone” seems to have been established.
However, this “no-fly zone” is not focused on preventing Syrian planes
and military forces from operating inside the country. Instead, it functions as a barrier to Israeli and American air forces seeking to enter Syria through the Mediterranean Sea in order to support terrorists and jihadists against the secular government of Bashar al-Assad.
This is because of Russia’s Naval
presence in the port of Tartus and its new presence just off the coast
of Latakia, particularly with ships like the guided missile cruiser
Moscow. The ship left Crimea on September 24 and is part of what Russian
media is referring to as training exercises.
The Russian Ministry of Defense has stated,
In the course of the training activity, the Russian ships will practice organization of anti-submarine, anti-ship, and air defense, as well as search-and-rescue activities and rendering assistance to distressed vessels.During the exercise, the military seamen are to perform over 40 different combat, tasks including missile and artillery firings at surface and aerial targets.
Clearly, the ship is in the Mediterranean
for more than simple maneuvers. But its presence is also being bemoaned
by the obsessively pro-Israeli, pro-NATO, and pro-war crowds howling in
the pages of mainstream media outlets about being prevented from being
able to cross national borders at will and rain death and destruction
down upon innocent civilians and the primary force fighting ISIS and
other jihadists in Syria.
As pro-Israeli writer “Eli” from SOFREP wrote in an article that was reposted by Business Insider,
By positioning the Moskva, a cruiser armed with S300 missiles, west of Latakia, the Russians have endangered the IAF’s favorite corridor of flight into Syria. The IAF has no stealth capabilities to circumvent this anti-access/area denial — A2/AD — bubble, nor any other air force in the area.Russian President Vladimir Putin managed to do in several days what US President Barack Obama failed to do in the last three years: He’s created a true no-fly zone. Putin’s actions suggest, in my opinion, that he’s willing to force the coalition and the Israel air force into reporting and coordinating their flights in the region — an act I’m sure no one is in favor of or willing to comply with.The Moskva carries an estimated 64 S-300 missiles, according to foreign sources), and could intercept multiple targets up to 150 miles away, making it a serious threat in addition to other Russian assets in the region.The presence of the Moskva essentially locks down British air assets in Cyprus, American F-16s in the southern part of Turkey, and the Israeli air force, which likes to use that particular flight corridor for penetration into Syria, or alternatively when flying over the western part of Lebanon. Any flights in or around the country will now be tricky for the IAF to accomplish.
“Eli” has made an astute observation. Unless
the Israelis and NATO powers are truly willing to risk World War 3, the
ability to simply fly in through and over the Mediterranean has been
severely hampered by the Russian presence.
NATO and Israel could indeed identify themselves and their intentions
but they could be denied overflight permission to do so. They would then
be forced with the choice between simply stepping back or risking a
direct confrontation with Russian jets in the air.
Furthermore, “Eli” concludes that danger is indeed present. He writes,
So what happens to coalition surveillance flights? What about airdrops to parties in the region supported by the coalition? This will become another complicated situation which will require the precision of a surgeon and the creativity of artists. One thing is certain: The Kremlin’s recent move is dangerous and places us all in danger. It may be time to dust off the old Cold War books.
Yet, while “Eli” laments the Russian
presence in the Mediterranean and Syria and attempts to suggest that
Russia is simply expanding its empire, his thesis is concerning for
three reasons.
First, it is perhaps the case that the
United States and Israel have violated human rights and national
borders for so long that neither their citizens nor their cheerleaders
have any grasp of the difference between imperialism and self-defense.
Second,
“Eli” is lamenting the Russian presence because he views the Western
support of savages raping and beheading their way across Syria as
legitimate and justified. He implicitly argues that the Israeli Air
Force, along with the U.S. Air Force, has and should continue to have
the divine right to cross national borders at will, drop bombs on
civilians and national governments as they choose, and be free from any
and all consequences of doing so. The
“exceptional” people and the “chosen” people thus make a very good team,
complete with the blessings of God and the rest of the world. There is
one major problem, however – the fact that Israel and the United States
no longer have the blessing of the world to continue their slaughter
unabated. Russia has had enough and so have many other nations.
Which brings us to the most
concerning aspect of “Eli’s” position – that he and those he represents
are willing to risk World War 3 to continue settlement and colonization
of the Middle East and other “non-compliant” nations.
“Eli’s” article would not be so
concerning if it were not for the fact that it represents the viewpoint
of a ruling elite that is so committed to world hegemony that it very
well might risk the literal destruction of the world in search of those
aims. While “Eli” describes the “Kremlin’s recent moves” as “dangerous”
and having placed us all in danger, the Kremlin is only acting in a way
that defends its own self-interests.
If “Eli” is concerned with the danger that we all face, he would do well to warn the White House and the Knesset.
Brandon Turbeville – article archive here
– is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s
Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President.
Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of
subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil
liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found
every Monday night 9 pm EST atUCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.