September, Thursday 19th., 2019Who Really Benefits From The "Iran Attacked Saudi Arabia" Narrative?

  September, Thursday 19th., 2019

"...but contrary to popular opinion I think it's wrong to assume that the PNAC was designed to open the door to American hegemony. Rather, I think the intention was to cause the opposite – the eventual fall of American geopolitical influence. After all, what happened to the Soviet Union after they bungled into a land war in Afghanistan? Only a long and costly quagmire that ultimately contributed to their economic downfall. This is exactly what is happening to the US today. Are we to believe the elites are completely unaware of this outcome?..."

Who Really Benefits From The "Iran Attacked Saudi Arabia" Narrative?

The new official story is being tweaked everyday to counter any predictable skepticism... Simply put, they see crisis and chaos as the fastest stimulants of fear, and the most useful engines for global change.

• Sep 18, 2019 11:55 PM
  

  by Tyler Durden

  Wed, 09/18/2019 - 23:55
  
  
  Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,
  After 9/11, the concept of the “false flag attack” gained prominence in American culture, and ever since, more and more people are starting to question the official narrative whenever new crisis events occur. It is possible that this is why there has not been another attack in the US on the scale of 9/11 since 2001; not because the government is doing a better job with security (there was ample security in operation on 9/11 that for some reason was not utilized), but because it's harder for government agencies to get away fabricated disasters or scapegoating the wrong people as the culprits.
  
  That said, sometimes governments don't need to create a false flag from scratch. Sometimes disasters not of the government's making can be turned into false flags, as long as they can pin the blame on the target they most want to attack.
  

  The elites only need to get away with one major false flag every couple of decades to push the populace into a war or a cultural crisis which can be exploited.
  This was essentially the strategy outlined by the “Project For A New American Century”, a foreign policy think tank in the 1990's made up of Neo-Cons and ghouls from the Council On Foreign Relations which called for a “new Pearl Harbor” that would give the US a rationale to enter the Middle East militarily and change the entire political landscape. As Rahm Emanuel once said, “You never want a serious crisis go to waste...”
  Of course, they got their Pearl Harbor, but contrary to popular opinion I think it's wrong to assume that the PNAC was designed to open the door to American hegemony. Rather, I think the intention was to cause the opposite – the eventual fall of American geopolitical influence. After all, what happened to the Soviet Union after they bungled into a land war in Afghanistan? Only a long and costly quagmire that ultimately contributed to their economic downfall. This is exactly what is happening to the US today. Are we to believe the elites are completely unaware of this outcome?......................................................................................