Σήμερα 31 Μαϊου 2017 και
ώρα 11:40, τέσσερα τουρκικά F-16 εισήλθαν στο FIR Αθηνών μεταξύ Λήμνου -
Λέσβου και στις 11:56 πραγματοποίησαν υπέρπτηση άνωθεν νήσων Καλόγηροι
σε ύψος 29.000 ποδών.
Ακολούθως διαχωρίσθηκαν και εξήλθαν του FIR Αθηνών στις 12:13 (2 F-16) και 12:16 (2 F-16) μεταξύ Λήμνου - Λέσβου.
Χθες η γειτονική χώρα πραγματοποίησε σαράντα παραβιάσεις του
εθνικού εναερίου χώρου σε βορειοανατολικό, κεντρικό και νοτιοανατολικό
Αιγαίο με τουρκικά αεροπλάνα και ελικόπτερα, με την πλειονότητά τους -37
παραβιάσεις- να αναλογεί σε μόλις δύο αεροσκάφη ναυτικής
συνεργασίας/ηλεκτρονικού πολέμου CN-235.
31.05.2017/12:42
Wednesday, May 31st., 2017 OBOR- 'One Belt One Road' Maps
This IS the New Reality !Better adopt, adapt and udjust as soon as possible ! Let us allow Germany to follow their deep- newworldorderishnazieconomic-status, behavioural attitude and consequent fate, let us also give space to the new American Governance to handle its own deep-technologically/scientifically malevolent-swampy shadow state. Let us forgive and forget the evil, criminal, devastating attacks that were funneled down Humanity's throat, throughout all past aeons and years... Let us all harmonically, lovingly, creatively and innovatively start working for our common Galactic, Multi-versal Future, in true, (non-Sorosish) solidarity. Each nation, each tribe, each area, each culture, according to their own geopolitical, geophysical, hereditary, ancestral characteristics and traditions, being all of them uniquely precious, in respect for each other. Nothing else, nothing more is required . OBOR seems to boil down into one of the proper challenges of nowtimes!Some more should be following soon... If We Dont' Act according to the 'new evolutions', even though if we came to know about them after they were already strategically organized and already practically manifesting at our unawares, perhaps we shall be called responsible for negligence, neglectfulness and default against ourselves by the Coming Historian, charged with the research of the ...extinct Human Race... Maria L. Pelekanaki
Sunday, May 28, 2017 Connecting Consciousness Simon Parkes s
With
the terror threat level downgraded from critical, it's becoming
apparent that the British security services had very little intelligence
to go on - GCHQ the British / American communications
intercepted information detected absolutely nothing - Because the
organisers of the attack were conducting all their meetings face to face
and not over electronic mediums.
Sunday, May 28, 2017 Connecting Consciousness Simon Parkes s
I
have now been told that the huge interference to both Gatwick airport
and Heathrow airport in Britain was a targeted attack to measure the
level of disruption and effectiveness of such an attack.
On The Manchester Attack... Monday, May 29, 2017 Connecting Consciousness
Simon Parkes s
In
a previous post regarding the Manchester bombing, I said a rucksack was
used to carry the bomb - All the British news agencies were pushing the
line that a bomb vest was used.
Now
American intelligence quoting British forensic evidence report that
indeed a rucksack was most likely used to carry the bomb - I was aware
of this 4 hours after the blast, yet established British Media peddled
the lie, even when MI5 knew as I did.
What
citizens of the world are NOT being told is why did American
intelligence leak the British taken photographs of the bomb parts found
at the Manchester attack?
Answer
because the US wanted to show the world that the level of
sophistication was beyond a ‘Rag Tag Arab Terrorist group’ The bomb
detonator indeed had a complex team organising him.
Ένα
καλοστημένο δίκτυο δωροδοκιών, που δρούσε επί μακρόν, δίνοντας
χρηματικά δώρα και άλλα ωφελήματα, κυρίως σε γιατρούς και νοσηλευτές
δημόσιων νοσοκομείων, αποκαλύπτει η πολυσέλιδη εισαγγελική πρόταση, με
την οποία ζητείται η παραπομπή σε δίκη έξι ατόμων για δωροδοκίες, με την
επιβαρυντική περίσταση του νόμου περί καταχραστών του Δημοσίου. Κατά
την εισαγγελική κρίση, το ποσό, συνολικής αξίας 1.894.416 ευρώ, το
λάμβαναν γιατροί και νοσηλευτές «παρανόμως και ασυμβίβαστα με την
ιδιότητά τους», αφού η πολιτεία τούς είχε εμπιστευθεί για την κρίση τους
σε έναν τομέα ευαίσθητο που αφορά την υγεία των πολιτών. Κατηγορούμενοι
είναι πρώην στελέχη της Bayer ΕΛΛΑΣ ΑΒΕΕ και δύο εκπρόσωποι εταιρειών
που φέρονται ότι συνέδραμαν με τις ενέργειές τους την εξέλιξη του κύκλου
των δωροδοκιών, που σύμφωνα με την εισαγγελική πρόταση έφτασαν τα
789.268 ευρώ σε χρήμα και το 1.105.148 σε είδος. Τι είδος; Κινητά
τηλέφωνα, λάπτοπ, τηλεοράσεις, βιντεοκάμερες, ταξίδια, ακόμη και ιατρικά
εργαλεία. Στόχος; Η προώθηση και η συνταγογράφηση φαρμάκων της
εταιρείας, με δυο λόγια η προτίμησή της έναντι άλλων εταιρειών. Από την
έρευνα που διενήργησε το ΣΔΟΕ αλλά και τα στοιχεία που κατέθεσε ένας εκ
των κατηγορουμένων, κάνοντας καταγγελία στη Γερμανία, προκύπτει ότι
1.357 γιατροί αλλά και νοσηλευτές έπαιρναν ωφελήματα από το 2005 έως το
2009 που δεν έπρεπε να πάρουν, ζημιώνοντας ταυτόχρονα το ελληνικό
Δημόσιο. Τα χρήματα που εντόπισε η έρευνα στους τραπεζικούς λογαριασμούς
των γιατρών και των προϊσταμένων νοσηλευτικών υπηρεσιών δημόσιων
νοσοκομείων κυμαίνονταν από 1.000 έως 22.000 ευρώ. Το συνολικό ποσό της
ζημίας αγγίζει τα 1.894.416 ευρώ...
Μια από τις πιο έγκυρες και πιο έγκριτες γερμανικές εφημερίδες με
άριστη πληροφόρηση, η “Zeit”, έχει σήμερα (27.05.17) ως πρωτοσέλιδο:
«Ελλάδα και Τουρκία- Επικίνδυνες Προκλήσεις». Η εφημερίδα αναφέρεται
στις λεγόμενες «Dogfights» (αγγλ. Σκυλοκαβγάδες ή μάχες
μέχρι θανάτου) αερομαχίες, οι οποίες, έχουν πολλαπλασιαστεί επικίνδυνα
και έχουν πάρει σχεδόν τη μορφή αληθινών αερομαχιών. Σύμφωνα με την
εφημερίδα, παίρνοντας υπόψη τη σωματική και ψυχική καταπόνηση των
πιλότων και των δύο πλευρών, είναι θέμα χρόνου να συμβεί αυτό που οι
Γάλλοι αποκαλούν «derapage-ένα λάθος, μια παρέκκλιση ή απώλεια ελέγχου».
At least 137kg of Captagon, dubbed a “jihadist drug” and “the
drug of the Syrian conflict,” was seized at Paris Charles de Gaulle
Airport in a first for France, customs officials said, adding that half
of the illicit cargo was destined for Saudi Arabia.
“This
is the first time this drug has been seized in France. The value of the
goods is estimated at around €1.5 million on the illicit market,” the statement said.
According
to the customs services website, Captagon is a psychostimulant created
in the late 1950s and now mainly consumed in the Middle East.
In
January, customs officers at Charles de Gaulle Airport intercepted two
industrial molds coming from Lebanon and destined for the Czech
Republic. “The drug was actually concealed [inside] the
molds... In total, [customs officers] extracted some 350,000 pills with a
total weight of 70kg,” the statement added.
France
then launched an investigation together with the German and Czech
authorities. It later appeared that the cargo was actually destined for
Saudi Arabia, passing via Turkey.
A second batch of the “jihadist drug” was seized at the airport in February in a cargo heading from Lebanon to Africa. “The [customs] agents [seized] 67kg of Captagon pills concealed… inside steel molds,” the statement added. READ MORE: Saudi prince arrested on private plane with 2 tons of drugs - reports
Captagon, an amphetamine-type stimulant, is widely distributed in the Middle East, according to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime.
The drug is currently used by jihadists in several Middle Eastern war zones to enhance battle performance, according to various reports.
Captagon
increases blood pressure, heart rate and alertness, Carl Hart,
professor of psychology and psychiatry at Columbia University, told the Live Science website. Hart, however, dismissed the media claims that the drug can turn users into “supersoldiers.”
Premières saisies de captagon en France - 750 000 comprimés à Roissy
Antonio Guterres (L), Secretary-General of
the United Nations, stands near Rex Tillerson (5-R), the United States
Secretary of State, and Nikki Haley (3-R), the United States Ambassador
to the United Nations, following an United Nations Security Council
meeting at United Nations headquarters in New York, New York, USA. EPA,
JUSTIN LANE
Απορρίπτει με κατηγορηματικό τρόπο η Ελλάδα τους ισχυρισμούς της
κυβέρνησης της Τουρκίας, όπως διατυπώθηκαν σε επιστολή του μονίμου
αντιπροσώπου της, πρέσβη Φεριντούν Σινιρλίογλου προς το γενικό γραμματέα
του ΟΗΕ, Αντόνιο Γκουτέρες και με την οποία έθετε θέμα κυριαρχίας στο
Αιγαίο Πέλαγος. ΕΔΩ Η ΑΠΕΙΛΗΤΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΣΤΟΛΗ ΤΗΣ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑΣ
Στην επιστολή του, που κατέθεσε στα Ηνωμένα Έθνη ο μόνιμος αντιπρόσωπος
της Τουρκίας, η Άγκυρα ουσιαστικά απειλούσε με casus belli τόσο την
Λευκωσία όσο και τις δυο εταιρίες που έχουν κερδίσει τον διαγωνισμό για
το Οικόπεδο 6, καθώς όχι μόνο αμφισβητούσε τη δυνατότητα της Κύπρου για
διενέργεια ερευνών αλλά και αδειοδότησης των Οικοπέδων της Κυπριακής
ΑΟΖ, αλλά δήλωνε με τον πιο επίσημο τρόπο στον ΟΗΕ, ότι ένα μέρος του
Οικοπέδου 6 ανήκει στην τουρκική υφαλοκρηπίδα.
Η μόνιμη αντιπρόσωπος της Ελλάδας στον Διεθνή Οργανισμό, κ. Αικατερίνη
Μπούρα απέστειλε σχετική επιστολή, η οποία δημοσιεύθηκε ως έγγραφο της
Γενικής Συνέλευσης του ΟΗΕ και του Συμβουλίου Ασφαλείας, ενώ θα
συμπεριληφθεί και στο επόμενο δελτίο του Δικαίου της Θάλασσας.
Η κ. Μπούρα απορρίπτει όλους τους ισχυρισμούς των Τούρκων και τονίζει
ότι «σύμφωνα με το σύνηθες και το συμβατικό διεθνές δίκαιο, τα ελληνικά
νησιά, συμπεριλαμβανομένων εκείνων της εν λόγω περιοχής, δικαιούνται να
διαθέτουν δικές τους θαλάσσιες ζώνες (ηπειρωτική υφαλοκρηπίδα ή / και
αποκλειστική οικονομική ζώνη), όπως κάθε άλλη χερσαία περιοχή».
Το κείμενο της επιστολής ακολουθεί:
Αναφορικά με την επιστολή της 12ης Απριλίου 2017 του Μόνιμου
Αντιπροσώπου της Τουρκίας προς τον Γενικό Γραμματέα
(A/71/875S/2017/321), έχω την τιμή να δηλώσω τα εξής:
Η Ελλάδα απορρίπτει στο σύνολό τους, τους ισχυρισμούς της Τουρκίας, που
περιέχονται στην προαναφερθείσα επιστολή σχετικά με τον ορισμό των
εξωτερικών ορίων της ηπειρωτικής υφαλοκρηπίδας της Τουρκίας στην
Ανατολική Μεσόγειο. Είναι αβάσιμοι, αναπόδεικτοι και στερούνται νομικής
βάσης.
Οι ισχυρισμοί αυτοί αγνοούν πλήρως ipso facto και ab initio κυριαρχικά
δικαιώματα άλλων κρατών, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της Ελλάδας, στη θαλάσσια
περιοχή της Ανατολικής Μεσογείου δυτικά του μεσημβρινού 32 ° 16’18”Ε.
Τα δικαιώματα αυτά απορρέουν από το διεθνές δίκαιο της θάλασσας.
Πρέπει να υπενθυμιστεί ότι, σύμφωνα με το σύνηθες και το συμβατικό
διεθνές δίκαιο, τα ελληνικά νησιά, συμπεριλαμβανομένων εκείνων της εν
λόγω περιοχής, δικαιούνται να διαθέτουν δικές τους θαλάσσιες ζώνες
(ηπειρωτική υφαλοκρηπίδα ή / και αποκλειστική οικονομική ζώνη), όπως
κάθε άλλη χερσαία περιοχή.
Από την άποψη αυτή, η Ελλάδα επιθυμεί να επαναλάβει τη θέση της επί των
θεμάτων αυτών όπως εκτέθηκαν επανειλημμένα, μεταξύ άλλων στις επιστολές
της 23ης Μαΐου και της 8ης Δεκεμβρίου 2016 του Μονίμου Αντιπροσώπου της
Ελλάδας προς τον Γενικό Γραμματέα (A / 70 / 900- S / 2016/474 και A /
71/675-S / 2016/1043 αντίστοιχα) και τη ρηματική διακοίνωση αριθ. 974
της Μόνιμης Αντιπροσωπείας της Ελλάδος, ημερομηνίας 8 Μαΐου 2012. Θα σας
ήμουν ευγνώμων εάν διακινούσατε την επιστολή αυτή ως έγγραφο της
Γενικής Συνέλευσης, με βάση τα σημεία 41 και 73 (α) της ημερήσιας
διάταξης και του Συμβουλίου Ασφαλείας, και εάν την δημοσιεύατε στο
επόμενο Δελτίο του Δικαίου της Θάλασσας.
Προκάλεσαν
εκατομμύρια νεκρούς οι Γάλλοι πολιτικοί (στις αποικίες, στους πολέμους
του ΝΑΤΟ κ.λπ.), πάντα υπηρετώντας τους τοκογλύφους ...αλλά στο θέμα των
gay ...σπαράζουν από αυθόρμητη αλληλεγγύη...
Τα
μωρά που αποκεφάλιζαν οι μισθοφόροι της Ε.Ε. και του ΝΑΤΟ... έπρεπε να
πεθάνουν όπως τα 576.000 μωρά στο Ιράκ... «Ο σκοπός αγιάζει τα μέσα»
δίδασκαν οι Ιησουίτες... στα σχολεία των οποίων μαθήτευσε κι ο «φιλεύσπλαχνος» Μακρόν.
Translation - Anoosha Boralessa Voltairenet Tue, 30 May 2017 14:25 UTC
General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr
Just
as the Russian and US armies are being deployed in the enlarged Middle
East, three channels of communications have been opened up:
1. General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., has been appointed to the US joint
military staff, to handle with the utmost promptitude, any problem
between the two armies operating in the region.
2. A direct line of communication has been set up between those heading
the operations that the two countries are carrying out in Iraq and
Syria, to coordinate their efforts in the four de-escalation zones
established under the Astana agreements. These agreements have been
concluded under the auspices of Iran, Russia and Turkey but have not
been officially recognized by the United States. Thus it seems that there is another agreement, a secret agreement between Moscow and Washington on this point.
3. A direct line has just been set up between the CentCom Commander,
General Joseph Votel, and his Russian homologue. This is to deal with
strategic, not tactical, problems.
This step is going to revolutionize the customary conduct of the
US armed forces which have always been opposed to the creation of such
structures. It is the direct consequence of the new strategy that Donald
Trump has given life to.
"...The failed CIA orchestrated Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 infuriated
Kennedy. It was at this time that Kennedy developed a seething hatred of
the CIA. Kennedy saw the Cuban Missile Crisis of the following year as a
direct outgrowth of the CIA's counter-productive provocation of the
Soviet Union's Cuban ally..."
JFK's
White House talked to the Soviet Union in order to facilitate peace.
Donald Trump's associates may have done the same with modern Russia. In
each case, their opponents have been on the wrong side of history.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy would have been 100 years old this week, had an
assassin's bullet still shrouded in mystery not taken his life in 1963.
As a child, Kennedy was something of both a haunting and a heroic figure
to me. Everyone talked about the young, eloquent, scholarly President
and how particularly unjust, unfair and utterly tragic his death was.
Were I a Catholic, I'm sure I would feel there was even some Book of Job like test of faith involved in his death.
As a typical teen who moderately rebelled against the shibboleths
of childhood, I came to see Kennedy as a man whose death was
conspiratorial to the extreme and therefore deeply unfair, but beyond
that and the singular moment of the titanic Cuban Missile Crisis, I took
the view that Kennedy was rather young and inexperienced and died
before he could grow into a genuine leadership position.
This was a view that many in America and throughout the world held for
decades. It was a by-product of a Nixon era that killed idealism
surrounding the White House and a slightly later Reagan era that loved
to present small details and rhetorical coups into actual achievements.
But while Reagan said 'tear down this wall', Kennedy was actually working to build bridges over various walls, including 'that wall', throughout the latter periods of his Presidency.
When JFK became President he was a breath of fresh idealism during a
Cold War that had previously been dominated by the 'egg head' Adlai
Stevenson on the left and a John Birch Society on the right that came
out with frequent publications on how even Ike Eisenhower was a 'secret communist'.
The businesslike/ultra-politician Nixon lost the 1960 Presidential
election to a JFK who looked and sounded like the future. Kennedy like
his personal acquiescence, the right-wing but libertarian Cold Warrior
hawk Barry Goldwater (yes, such things existed in the Cold War), was an
instinctual and ideological anti-communist, but Kennedy also offered a
king of below the surface pragmatism that many mistook for weakness.
Crucially, both the Democrat Kennedy and the Republic Goldwater, unlike
today's class of US politicians, did not harbor personal animus against
Russian culture, the Russia people or Russia's pre-Bolshevik Orthodox
Christian traditions. In many ways, the American anti-communists at the
time were friends of Russia's Orthodox tradition, albeit at times
'friends' that they didn't necessarily need or want.
Upon becoming President, Kennedy surrounded himself with family. His
brother Robert who was the most scholarly and impassioned of the Kennedy
clan became Attorney General, while his more street minded political
mover and shaker brother Edward managed the campaign.
The young Kennedy White House came into contact with what we now
call the 'deep state' fairly early on. Kennedy who favored transparency
in government was viscerally appalled at the covert attempts of
organizations like the CIA to sabotage this transparency.
The failed CIA orchestrated Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 infuriated
Kennedy. It was at this time that Kennedy developed a seething hatred of
the CIA. Kennedy saw the Cuban Missile Crisis of the following year as a
direct outgrowth of the CIA's counter-productive provocation of the
Soviet Union's Cuban ally.
It was only after the Bay of Pigs disaster that Robert Kennedy started
to hold secret conversations with the Soviet Intelligence officer Georgi
Bolshakov. Through him, the White House was at long last able to speak
directly with the Soviet Union and speak in a civilized manner away from
the public spotlight. This may have gone a long way in helping Kennedy
to avert disaster during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
After the Cuban Missile Crisis, the US and USSR set up a direct hotline
between the two countries to avoid future confrontations. It cannot and
must not be understated how the covert communications of the Kennedy
White House prior to the Missile Crisis helped lay the foundation for
the two sides officially talking to one another during a time when
communication was growing ever more essential.
Kennedy's first major public foreign policy shift came during a speech
in June of 1963 at the American University. The so-called Peace Speech
was one of the final major speeches Kennedy would give before being
killed in November of 1963.
In his speech, Kennedy said,
"What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not a Pax
Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the
peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about
genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living,
the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a
better life for their children - not merely peace for Americans but
peace for all men and women - not merely peace in our time but peace for
all time.
I speak of peace because of the new face of war. Total war makes no
sense in an age when great powers can maintain large and relatively
invulnerable nuclear forces and refuse to surrender without resort to
those forces. It makes no sense in an age when a single nuclear weapon
contains almost ten times the explosive force delivered by all the
allied air forces in the Second World War. It makes no sense in an age
when the deadly poisons produced by a nuclear exchange would be carried
by wind and water and soil and seed to the far corners of the globe and
to generations yet unborn.
Today the expenditure of billions of dollars every year on weapons
acquired for the purpose of making sure we never need to use them is
essential to keeping the peace. But surely the acquisition of such idle
stockpiles - which can only destroy and never create - is not the only,
much less the most efficient, means of assuring peace.
I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of
rational men. I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic as
the pursuit of war - and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on
deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task."
He continued,
"No government or social system is so evil that its people must be
considered as lacking in virtue. As Americans, we find communism
profoundly repugnant as a negation of personal freedom and dignity. But
we can still hail the Russian people for their many achievements - in
science and space, in economic and industrial growth, in culture and in
acts of courage.
Among the many traits the peoples of our two countries have in common,
none is stronger than our mutual abhorrence of war. Almost unique among
the major world powers, we have never been at war with each other. And
no nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet
Union suffered in the course of the Second World War. At least 20
million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and farms were
burned or sacked. A third of the nation's territory, including nearly
two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland - a loss
equivalent to the devastation of this country east of Chicago.
Today, should total war ever break out again - no matter how - our two
countries would become the primary targets. It is an ironic but accurate
fact that the two strongest powers are the two in the most danger of
devastation. All we have built, all we have worked for, would be
destroyed in the first 24 hours. And even in the cold war, which brings
burdens and dangers to so many nations, including this Nation's closest
allies - our two countries bear the heaviest burdens. For we are both
devoting massive sums of money to weapons that could be better devoted
to combating ignorance, poverty, and disease. We are both caught up in a
vicious and dangerous cycle in which suspicion on one side breeds
suspicion on the other, and new weapons beget counterweapons.
In short, both the United States and its allies, and the Soviet
Union and its allies, have a mutually deep interest in a just and
genuine peace and in halting the arms race. Agreements to this end are
in the interests of the Soviet Union as well as ours - and even the most
hostile nations can be relied upon to accept and keep those treaty
obligations, and only those treaty obligations, which are in their own
interest.
So, let us not be blind to our differences - but let us also direct
attention to our common interests and to the means by which those
differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences,
at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the
final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this
small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's
future. And we are all mortal."
This speech was without a doubt the most radical shift in favor of peace
delivered by any major US President during the Cold War. The speech
challenged the prevailing narrative of the US stand-off with the Soviet
Union. It implied that dialogue, genuine co-existence, attempts at
building mutual understandings and that seeing Soviet citizens as
'fellow men' rather than alien objects was possible. In 1960s America
this was revolutionary. To the deep state, it was treason.
Many have commented on the proximity of this speech with Kennedy's
untimely assassination. Kennedy's assassination is a subject which the
world will probably never have all the answers too. Like 9/11, it
remains an issue that will forever divide America and the world, even
though most people inside and outside of the US, do not believe the
official stories about either tragedy. Still, no one can agree on which
'non-official' version is the most accurate.
Had Kennedy lived and had he won a second term, he may have been
able to engage in something even more meaningful than Nixon's greatly
undervalued detente. Kennedy could have brought peace between
superpowers and done so without firing a shot let alone compromising the
integrity and dignity of either side.
Kennedy's ability to use his bother Robert's mind to convey the truth of
White House thinking to the Soviet Union combined with JFK's public
call for peace could have changed the world. In this sense, Kennedy's
intelligence, dignity and optimism was more than just window dressing.
He was in fact, the real deal.
Now that we're living in a new and even more foolish Cold War, Donald
Trump offered a breath of fresh air when it came to thinking about
Russia. Where Kennedy was killed by the bullet, Donald Trump's plans for
peace have been killed by a thousand little blows. Trump's Russophobic
opposition are trying to assassinate his credibility and character.
Even if someone in Trump's team, whether Mike Flynn or Jared Kushner or
anyone else is 'talking with the Russians', what is wrong with that?
Churchill said "To jaw-jaw is better than to war-war'. Kennedy
understood this, so too does Donald Trump.
I've always felt that Donald Trump like Kennedy is honest about his
political intentions and that also his heart is in the right place. They
are very different men but both came to the conclusion that peace is
worth striving for.
Indeed no matter the style of delivery, peace is a universal language.
The deep state and others who seek to profit from conflict cannot speak
of it, but they can hear it.
They have shown in the past that they will stop at nothing so that others cannot hear the call.
BPEarthWatch
